In literature, “minimum” is employed as both a literal measurement and a conceptual boundary that denotes the smallest possible amount or degree in various contexts. In more analytical texts, such as those by William James, the term is used to define the lower limits of phenomena—whether it be the minimum time needed to process sensory information or the irreducible essence of consciousness itself [1, 2, 3]. In other works, “minimum” functions as a precise quantitative baseline; for instance, Thomas Jefferson sets a fixed numerical requirement, and practical guides outline the minimum resources needed in a given scenario [4, 5, 6]. Even in narrative or conversational prose, as demonstrated by Doctorow and others, “minimum” underscores essential thresholds—from the minimum effort required to achieve an outcome to the baseline conditions necessary for success [7, 8, 9]. Thus, the word consistently serves to articulate the least necessary condition or element, bridging the gap between empirical measurement and abstract reasoning.