The term “microscopic” in literature is employed in multifaceted ways, often blending literal scientific observation with metaphorical nuance. In works like Jesse F. Bone’s and Chekhov’s compiled stories [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], it describes a meticulous, almost obsessive level of scrutiny—whether in a character’s searching gaze or the diminutive stature of its subjects. Meanwhile, poets like Alexander Pope [7, 8] and historical figures such as Napoleon [9, 10] use the term to question or emphasize the limitations and peculiarities of human perception. In contrast, adventure narratives by Jules Verne [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] and scientific inquiries [17, 18, 19] invoke “microscopic” to denote the minute details of the natural world, from the behavior of tiny organisms to the intricate structure of matter. Collectively, these examples illustrate how “microscopic” serves as both a literal descriptor in scientific contexts and a metaphorical device for emphasizing precision or diminutive scale in human experiences.